Tolerance is a term that is used in abundance nowadays and perverted the minds of many well-meaning people. This isn’t a coincidence either. It is a coordinated effort to slowly push the goal post against men, driving us deeper into depravity.
Most traditional, masculine men are typically slow to anger, live and let live individuals. We got bigger fish to fry than worry about the thoughts and opinions of others. It is this mentality that is used against us, slowly heating up the water around us until it begins boiling without us even realizing it.
You must recognize this for what it is. These slow pushes against our traditional values are shit tests. The pushes are always small so that if you object, the person or group in question can simply gaslight you.
“It’s not big deal. Why would you want to deny X group their freedom to Y? Aren’t you tolerant?”
The pressure to concede, especially when you’re with a larger group, can be great. After all, no one wants to be THAT guy. The problem is, this is exactly what the other group wants. They want the wolves to concede so the deer can graze in open pastures. It’s a trap that you must be willing and clever enough to work around if your goal is to protect traditional values. These weaker individuals don’t want to face you one on one because they know they aren’t strong enough to best you on their own. Instead, they utilize the tool they fear the most against you; they try to out-group you.
Liberals, by and large, are herd creatures and, just like herd creatures in the wild, ostracism means death. In their own solipsism, they believe whatever works against them will surely work against others. As such, when their claims are rebutted, they will immediately try to turn the crowd against you. This is where your own wit comes into play. Getting angry and clashing directly with your opponent won’t win you any support. Instead you must employ some verbal Aikido against them and turn the tables without them even realizing it.
The first tactic to employ is to apply Socratic Questioning to the person’s claims. If they’re speaking absolute nonsense, a few “innocent” questions to help clarify will often begin punching holes in their argument. Typically it’s best not to immediately go on the offensive unless you know your own argument inside and out and know how to manipulate your audience. This is the power of Socratic Questioning. You’re neither confirming nor denying their claim and if they challenge you, you get to use their own tactic of gaslighting against them.
“Why are you getting so defensive? I’m just trying to understand your point of view better.”
Once you find some holes in their argument, begin probing deeper and ask them to further clarify their discrepancies and contradictions. Maintain an aura of innocence, but be ruthless in your persistence. Chances are, after a few minutes of this, they will lose their temper and lash out. This is when you have them dead to rights and can finish the argument with the crowd on your side. After all, this buffoon made an outlandish claim and then lost his temper when you were simply asking for clarification.
It should be obvious that this requires a good deal of Machiavellian skill as well as some patience and acting. It’s not an approach for everyone, so find what works best for you.
At the end of the day, we must not be afraid to push back against the degeneracy that is rotting away what made our country great. We must turn our nose up at short-term gratification that kills our spirit and dulls our discipline.
We must cherish our time honored traditions and say the magic two letter word when we’re asked to be tolerant of intolerable ideals: No.
No, we will not tolerate your depraved lifestyle.
No, we will not allow it in our homes.
No, you may not push it on our kids at school.
No, you will not force us to tolerate, let alone embrace it.